Anyone who knows me, knows that i’m most definitely not a hugely vocal feminist , i’m usually the first person to say some feminists go over the top. However, when i see it blatantly, i usually will call it, and not tolerate it.
One thing that does make my blood boil, is people who cross over female pornography or near naked pictures, with Tech. These things are NOT related. Females in Tech do not generally just rip off their clothes and pose with half a can of paint on their face.
Sure, some females in technology do this, but most do not. I also play ukulele, im not seeing anyone posting ukuleles on their I.T. blogs or feeds? Just because somebody may model or do other things as well as I.T., does not make it related to I.T.
The worst part about this crappy idealism in I.T., is that men somehow start expecting that females in I.T. ARE these sorts of people. It’s embarrassing and awkward when a guy hears you work in I.T. and asks for a picture.
So yesterday, i was a bit ‘WTF’ when i saw a picture of a near naked women go past in my google+ stream. Now, I have nothing against pornography, nor near naked females, models, or anything of the sort at all. I just have a problem when its posted by what is supposedly a Technology related page. In this case, it was TechWebCast
I took a breath and carefully worded a question and my objection to the image in question, only to be laughed at and have it trivialized by the guy that runs it Brad Chasenore . After i commented a second time, to explain that it was seriously objectionable, he removed the post.
I was rather annoyed at the treatment, but did not want to make a huge deal of it at the time, so i private messaged him asking why it was posted in the first place. I am always a believer in educating people rather than screaming at them, i figured perhaps he just did not realize how important this is to people?
In that conversation i felt that, again, he did not seem to really care, and seemed to try and imply somebody else posted it, but did not reply when i asked who. I went to his profile and found he had posted several other similar images of the same and another women at the same time from his own profile.
At this point i was still a little peeved off, but i can live with that, i was going to let things lie, i had mentioned something in passing to a friend Randi who also is female in Tech that i was a bit miffed . At this point in time, i was happy to let things lie, block him and forget about it all, accepting that he’s just a another idiot who does not get it. I had hoped for an apology, but had accepted that was not going to happen.
Randi made a small post about it which said
“So after all the controversy about geekli.st, they got a ton of signups. I guess +Brad Chasenore is trying to do the same thing with +Techwebcast … but in a far less interesting way. Learn some unique marketing techniques, buddy.”
At this point , he +1’d that, reshared it, and asked what that meant and what it was about, Several people commented asking about it. Randi mentioned to me this had happened, so i checked it out. I posted a link to a screenshot i had taken, because people were asking what it was about.
This was when Brad pitched in and must have decided to go all out and say ‘If you dont like what i post dont look’.
For me, that was the tipping point. It’s one thing to make a mistake, its another to be deliberately offensive and sexist, especially when you represent a Tech Podcast and have a larger Technical audience than average.
So i post this, in the hope that others will see the stupidity that most women in technology area have to deal with , and would prefer not too.
9 Replies to “Sexism, TechWebCast and Brad Chasenore”
I just kind of want to point him at a “learn english now” tutorial. He seems to have both reading comprehension issues as well as problems expressing himself in straightforward manners. Don’t even get me started on his grasp of marketing…
Furthermore, for someone that supposedly runs a tech podcast (which I’ve never heard of), he clearly has absolutely no grasp of current issues in tech, be they political or simply typical tech company gossip.
This guy is clearly an idiot. I mean, you can tell by the fact that he can’t write a single grammatically acceptable sentence. Why not just uncircle him and let him destroy himself slowly by posting shitty content? I see why you would get offended and start a dialogue, but honestly, you won’t change dumb asses like this, so let them be.
Thanks for posting though. Now I know who NOT to circle! haha
Heya, yeah i already uncircled him before Randi made her post 🙂
He probably didn’t mean to offend anyone with his original post, seems like a case of him not knowing his audience or distinguishing himself from his brand, if he’s going to post that kind of thing then he probably should market his channel add a tech/swim suit webcast instead of simply a tech webcast
Fairly sure he didn’t. However he has posted my blog post now, and the comments look like this
Fulvio Gerardi – She’s got you dead to rights on this.
Brad Chasenore – Like i give a fuck hahaha
However, he has deleted that post now also, as well as a lot of others.
Thank you for posting this. It came to my attention directly from Brad himself. I think possibly he was looking for validation that he was in the right. I promptly assured him, it was not acceptable to me either.I did try to help, however, and realise that the immature mentality will not respond to outrage or upset. I rationally explained the realities of business and how you present yourself online, the difference between being the lowest common denominator and the lack of quality respect you will earn, and I believe he understands the point that it is not right to be sharing this type of content on the Tech podcast page. I hope this doesn’t happen again, but as I am not Brad, I cannot assure it. Thanks for your post, by the way and also for taking screenshots before things were deleted.:)
Heya , Thanks. For what its worth, i think its education being needed more than anything
Reasoning with Brad is about as fruitful as teaching quantum mechanics to a dead weasel.
Comments are closed.